Therefore, it is preferable to have durable ranged troops. In the case of a player’s city attack, you will be attacking while being attacked by siege machines. In addition, Sassan and Thebes Unification has higher defense and HP, so it is better suited for player’s city attack than for building attack. In other words, the ground troops debuff is not useful unless the first wave of attacks is strong enough to annihilate the enemy mounted troops and ranged troops and then attack the ground troops. (Exception: countering an enemy ground troop’s attack may inflict damage). The order of attack for ranged troops is enemy mounted troops > ranged > ground, basically the first troop type must be annihilated before it can attack the next one. Thebes Unified has a high ground-troops debuff. In other words, it is suitable for those who are willing to give up to some extent on annihilating the enemy with a single blow and send a second wave. However, eliminating even ground troops is more difficult than other combinations. In a castle attack, the main objective is to eliminate enemy mounted troops while being attacked by the enemy’s siege machines and ranged troops.Īlthough their attack strength is low, ranged troops are strong against mounted troops, so it is possible to eliminate mounted troops to some extent. In other words, it is suitable for the first wave of a castle attack. Sasanian Unification has high ranged troops and siege machines debuff, but low attack strength. Mixed (buff oriented) has high attack strength and has debuffs for all types of soldiers. I don’t see any advantages over the others. I do not recommend unification in Plantagenet. * Unified – Sasanian Set / Plantagenet Set / Thebes Set After that, I select them so that as many set buffs as possible can be applied.Ī) Ranged General Mixed vs Unified – Comparative Overview
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |